Feux de cheminée : arriverons-nous à faire le deuil de nos traditions individualistes ?

Yes, why?



Those who suffer from such pollution are in the same situation as before the asbestos scandals. The politicians were also telling them: "we can’t do anything, even if it has been the demonstrated that asbestos is carcinogenic, because no law forbids it."

Asbestos has been banned in the (most) developed countries since the 80ies.

If you can see or smell smoke from your wood heater then you are causing a problem for yourself, your family and your neighbors. (The Australian Environment Protection Authority ―EPA)
A new log burning stove emits more PM2.5 each year than 1000 petrol cars.  (A study of Robinson, D. L., University of New England, Australia)
Even the old diesel trucks (from 2006 without particulate filter) pollute 25 times less than an eco-labelled stove. (Danish Ecological Council)


● This article does not promote a wood-burning prohibition, but a legal framework to reduce their toxicity level to an "acceptable" level. An acceptable level (for our time) would be in the same range as a diesel vehicle or heater. Because wood burning without adequate technology creates more particle pollution: in half day,  the fire emits as many fine particles as a diesel car traveling 3,500 km. Even an EPA certified stove (USA standard) operating 60 hours emits as much particulate as the motor of a car with an average engine size, traveling 18,000 kilometers.(*) - (*)


●There is no minimum level at which wood smoke could be good or harmless to breathe: the side effects can be experienced after both short and long exposure.(*) One carcinogenic particle in the wrong place at the wrong time can be enough to trigger a carcinogenic mutation that can lead to death several decades after exposure.


Wood smoke are at least as bad as cigarettes smoke, and probably much worse(*) (this study(*) on mice shows that wood smoke particles are 30 times more carcinogenic than cigarettes). Smoke from a regular firewood contains hundreds of compounds classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, and irritants for the respiratory system-(*)-(*)-(*).
Wood smoke vs trafficThe PAHs (Benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons): the NSW DECC Emissions Inventory reports that motor vehicles emit 1833 tons of benzene and 173 tons of PAH in Sydney; wood heaters emit 463 tons of benzene and 69 tons of PAH. With more than 2.86 million registered vehicles in Sydney, but only 0.106 million wood heaters, the average wood-heater emits 7 times as much benzene and 11 times as much PAH in Sydney as the average vehicle.

PAH in wood vs cigarette smoke: PAH are the best-known toxins in both cigarette and wood smoke. The U.S. EPA has designated 16 PAH compounds as priority pollutants. Five of these chemicals are in cigarette smoke. However, all 16 PAH are in eucalypt smoke - you would have to smoke 16,000 - 222,000 cigarettes to produce the equivalent amount of PAH as burning 1 kg firewood in a correctly operated heater. Most wood heaters burn about 30 kg wood per day, so, a typical correctly operated wood heater used for 1 day produces as many PAH as in the smoke of 0.5 - 7 millions of cigarettes. Read more.

Wood burning vs traffic pollution: wood smoke has 150 times more PAH and has a higher mutagenic potential (cf Table 2) than diesel exhaust particulates. Another study confirmed this result. Recently, the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) published statistics showing that “particulate matter from log burning in cities is more dangerous than pollution from traffic”. Research by Statistics Norway (SSB), meanwhile, concluded that 61% of the particulate matter in Norway’s air stems from its 1.7 million existing log fires, compared to 39% from private vehicles, buses and lorries.

The PAHC or dioxin (chlorinated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) are part of the organochlorine family. They are in the Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP) family as well as pesticides or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Dioxins one of the most toxic and hazardous pollutants we know. Dioxins produced during the combustion of wood (such as TCDD or "Seveso dioxin") are classified as extremely carcinogenic (ARC Group 1) for humans (lung cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, soft-tissue sarcoma...). These molecules accumulate in the food chain and are also associated with birth defects, fetal toxicity, impaired development of the child, endocrine disorders…

A 12-month study of 6 sites in Australia covering industrial and residential sites showed the concentration of dioxins were close to zero in industrial sites, except when wood stoves were used. The concentration of these pollutants were up to 10 times higher during the wood heating season (see Fig.3 in Gras et Müller, 2005).

The particulate matters (PM10, 5, 2.5 and 1): The NSW Government's “Action for Air” (2009) acknowledges PM2.5 are particularly dangerous: “Health research identifies particles of less than 2.5 micrograms (PM2.5) as a particular concern because their smaller size means they can be inhaled deeper into the lungs, and because there is no safe threshold level to use for setting standards.” PM2.5 – most closely linked to health problems: "Any reduction in exposure to particle pollution will have public health benefits. The health cost of particles air pollution in the NSW Greater Metropolitan is estimated to be around $4.7 billion per year (NSW DEC 2005; Jalaludin et al. 2011). The greatest proportion (>99%) of the health costs accrue from avoiding premature deaths due to long-term exposure to PM2.5." Source: Draft variation to the National Environment Protection (Ambient Air Quality) Measure, page xi, Executive Summary, published July 2014. More

● Three independent US long-term cohort studies found significant relationships between PM2.5 and cardiopulmonary mortality (*)-(*)-(*). The largest involved 500,000 subjects and 120,000 deaths and showed that a 10 µgm-3 increase in annual PM2.5 exposure increases cardiopulmonary mortality by 6–9% and lung cancer mortality by 8–14%.


particule Size of PM10 and PM2.5● Most of the particles generated by burning wood are smaller than a micron: this size is considered extremely dangerous for our lungs. These particles are so fine that they escape our muco-ciliary defenses and can go directly into the bloodstream, which poses a risk to the heart. The size of the particles that they also resist gravitational settling phenomena, and could remain in the air for weeks after extinguishing the fire.(*)


● Children who live in homes with active fireplaces or wood stoves, or in areas where wood burning is common, suffer from a higher incidence of asthma and cough(*), bronchitis(*), ear infections, infections of the upper respiratory tract and impaired lung function(*). In adults, burning wood is associated with more frequent visits to emergency rooms and hospital admissions for respiratory diseases with increased mortality from heart attacks(*).The inhalation of wood smoke, even at relatively low levels, alters pulmonary immune function, leading to increased susceptibility to colds, flu and other respiratory infections. This affects disproportionately the children and the elderly. Pollution of indoor air related to wood burning is also linked to higher risk of low birth weight and stillbirth.(*)


Since no serious legislation regulates wood burning (fireplace, in the summer and barbecue), and wood burning are much more common in the villages, the number of carcinogens particles floating in the air in the villages' streets bordering the smoking chimneys often exceeds that of large cities. Cancer risks (among others) caused by chimney smoke are thus as important in the countryside as in the cities.(*) Annual exposure to PM2.5 pollution in Armidale (a small town of 22,000 people, New South Wales, Australia) from wood smoke is more than double that from all sources in Sydney, a city of 4 million.(*) The estimates of 6% increased mortality for each additional 10 μg m−3 of PM2.5 suggests that wood heaters in Armidale may increase mortality in Armidale by about 7%, with estimated cost of about $4270 per wood heater per year. Short-term exposure was estimated to cause and additional 750 visits to GPs for respiratory complaints.


● The fires are also responsible for an increase in air pollution inside the apartments. The particles moved even in rooms that are not under the direct influence of the home, and they persist long after the shutdown of the combustion device.(*)


● Once they left the fire, toxic gases (benzene, for example) and the particles that make up smoke pass freely in the house and neighboring houses. (Nearly 70% of the fumes enters inside the neighboring buildings(*)).

wood smoke, the dirty source of energy


● Wood burning without adequate technology is an extremely dirty source of energy since it does not allow efficient heating and generates more toxic emissions than gas or even oil. (The use of appropriate technology increases the efficiency and reduces partly particulate emissions). Wood heating is responsible for 84% of PM 2.5 emissions while representing only 5% of all fuel used for home heating... Natural gas, which accounts for 80% of the fuels residential heating, emits less than 3%. Wood fires contribute about 23% to the total emissions of PM10 around Paris (Île-de-France), so they emit the same quantities of particles as the exhaust from road vehicles.(*)


●The air pollution causes 7 million deaths each year.(*) 100,000 deaths and 725,000 years of life lost per year are attributable to exposure to fine particles.(*) (The two main causes are diesels and wood burning).


Let's regulate the wood fires in residential areas,

○ because the one person's freedom ends where another's begins, and because this is not only about freedom, but the health of everyone.

○ because taking care of the air we all breathe should not be an option but an obligation.

○ because the air should not be treated as a trash.


Want to do something for those who suffer the most from this pollution? You could sign this petition (This petition asks the French government for a rational regulation of wood burning).

Related article

Polluted by wood smoke, or by our traditions, beliefs and lack of concern for those around us?


You can contribute by proposing new studies and quotes (based on research), and reporting errors and studies that have been refuted.

Scientific reports

● The World Health Organization report (based on 113 independent studies):

○ In brief: Household air pollution

The report

● The Australian Environment Protection Authority: Reducing wood smoke emissions


In the media

Follow the last news about woodburning pollution (studies, media, events...)

More people die from air pollution than Malaria and HIV/Aids, new study shows (The Guardian)

Wood smoke is natural, so it must be okay. Myths & Facts. And why Your Neighbor’s Wood Smoke is Killing You. (Families for Clean Air)

Everyone loves a wood-burning stove - but are they bad for us? (Telegraph)

Wood burners ‘worse than cars’ for contaminating air (The Times)

Wood-burning stoves are fueling rise in winter smog: Levels of one form of the pollution surge during colder months (DailyMail)

The Fireplace Delusion (Sam Harris)


Some videos


Regulations in the world

Denmark: Since January 2015, the emissions are strictly controlled throughout the country. Municipalities have the power to increase even more the restrictions in specific places (near schools, retirement homes, etc.)

● UK: the smokes are prohibited or controlled in some parts of UK. Those who care about their health (hygiene) can therefore move to these areas.

● Canada : in Quebec, it is prohibited to manufacture or sale of wood heaters which don't comply with the environmental regulation. Obligation to register wood-burning stoves and fireplaces in Montreal ($500 fine). Starting in 2018, wood-burning appliances will be banned unless they meet the rigorous new emission standards of 2.5 grams of fine particles or less per hour.For many years now, Montreal has conducted public awareness campaigns on wood-burning best practices. Unfortunately, no air quality improvement had been observed. In contrast, since the installation of new log-burning heaters was banned in 2009, the number of smoggy days in winter (where PM2.5 concentrations exceed 35 μg/m3 for more than 3 hours over 75% of Montréal) fell from 29 in 2009 to 10 in 2013.

● USA : some states do not allow non-certified devices, and prohibit wood burning on specific days (No Burn Days). California’s Healthy Hearths Programbans all wood-burning devices in new buildings and also bans use of all wood-burning devices whenever PM2.5 pollution is forecast to exceed the air quality standard. Wood smoke opacity is also regulated in many states.

Australia: no regulation, but the new regulations should take effect in July 2016

New Zealand: in some areas, wood burners have been forbidden in new houses since some studies showed that the areas with the highest levels of wood smoke had 68% more respiratory deaths, 22% more circulatory deaths and 16% more total deaths. Christchurch banned the use of old wood burners (over 15 years old). Otago restricted the use of some wood burners since January 2012 and impose the use of clean ones. The numerous prevention campaigns have raised awareness among the citizens about the dangers. It is possible to denounce the smoking chimneys to some associations which will visit these pollutant homes and teach them how to make fire more respectful of those around them.

Ireland: Dublin banned smoky home heating. There was 15.5% fewer respiratory and 10.3% fewer cardiovascular deaths (2,000 fewer deaths) in the 6 years after the ban on non-smokeless coal in September 1990. In 2013, 986 inspections were carried out by the EPA under the smoky coal ban and more than 100 enforcement actions were initiated.

Netherlands: cf. the comment below.

Norway : an exciting initiative from the newly established organization FriskBy. FriskBy plans to engage students from several high schools in Bergen to build, deploy and monitor more than 200 measuring sensors for air quality. According to the newspaper, these sensors will be placed at different locations around the city.

● France: no regulation.


This list is not exhaustive, you could help us to complete or update it by using the comment below.

You will find more on woodsmoke.3sc.net


Communities struggling with this issue and requesting wood burning regulation

Australia: Woodsmoke

USA : Families For Clean AirBurning IssuesClean Air FairbankSpare The Air

Netherlands: Platform HoutstookHoutrookHoutrookvrij

France: temoins.respire (association)AlpesBritany





Some studies demonstrating the toxicity of wood smoke

● 16th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 2–6 June 2008, Valencia, Spain –Oral Presentation OA9.5 (Une étude Suisse : influence of ignition and operations type on particle emissions from residential wood combustion)

● Air Resources Board (2014). California emission inventory data [online database]. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency (http://www.arb.ca.gov/ ei/emsmain/emsmain.htm, accessed 22 September 2014).

● Allen RW, Adar SD, Avol E, Cohen M, Curl CL, Larson T et al. (2012). Modeling the residential infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air). Environ Health Perspect. 120(6):824–830.

● Allen RW, Carlsten C, Karlen B, Leckie S, van Eeden S, Vedal S et al. (2011). An air filter intervention study of endothelial function among healthy adults in a woodsmokeimpacted community. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 183(9):1222–1230.

● Allen RW, Leckie S, Millar G, Brauer M (2009). The impact of wood stove technology upgrades on indoor residential air quality. Atmos Environ. 43(37):5908–5915. Alliance for Green Heat (2011). 2010 census shows wood is fastest growing heating fuel in US. Takoma Park, MD: Alliance for Green Heat (http://forgreenheat.blogspot. co.uk/2011/10/2010-census-shows-wood-is-fastest.html, accessed 21 October 2014).

Others studies
●Alliance for Green Heat (2013). Wood Stove Decathlon. Takoma Park, MD: Alliance for Green Heat (http://www.forgreenheat.org/stovedesign.html, accessed 26 November 2014).

●Alliance for Green Heat (2014). Policy: international – Sweden. Takoma Park, MD: Alliance for Green Heat (http://www.forgreenheat.org/policy/international/sweden. html, accessed 1 October 2014).

● Amann M, Bertok I, Borken-Kleefeld J, Cofala J, Heyes C, Hoeglund-Isaksson L, Klimont Z, Nguyen B, Posch M, Rafaj P, Sandler R, Schoepp W, Wagner F, Winiwarter W (2011). Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(12):1489-1501. Amann M, Borken-Kleefeld J, Cofala J, Hettenlingh JP, Heyes C, Höglund-Isaksson L, et al. (2014). The Final Policy Scenarios of the EU Clean Air Policy Package. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/ research/researchPrograms/MitigationofAirPollutionandGreenhousegases/TSAP_11- finalv1-1a.pdf, accessed 13 November 2014).

● Arbex MA, Martins LC, de Oliveira RC, Pereira LAA, Arbex FF, Delfini Cançado JE et al. (2007). Air pollution from biomass burning and asthma hospital admissions in a sugar cane plantation area in Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health. 61(5):395–400. Areskoug H, Camner P, Dahlén S-E, Låstbom L, Nyberg F, Pershagen G et al. (2000). Particles in ambient air: a health risk assessment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 26:1– 96.

● BAAQMD (2014a). Wood burning regulation. San Francisco, CA: Bay Area Air Quality Management District (http://www.sparetheair.org/Stay-Informed/ParticulateMatter/Wood-Smoke/Regulation.asp, accessed 21 October 2014).

● BAAQMD (2014b). Regulation 6, particulate matter and visible emissions: Rule 3, wood-burning devices. San Francisco, CA: Bay Area Air Quality Management District (http://www.baaqmd.gov/?sc_itemid=D39A3015-453E-4A0D-9C76-6F7F4DA5AED5, accessed 1 October 2014).

● Barn P, Larson T, Noullett M, Kennedy S, Copes R, Brauer M (2008). Infiltration of forest fire and residential wood smoke: an evaluation of air cleaner effectiveness. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 18:503–511.

● Barreca A, Clay K, Tarr J (2014). Coal, smoke, and death: bituminous coal and American home heating. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER Working Paper No. 19881; http://www.nber.org/papers/w19881, accessed 25 September 2014).

● Barregard L, Sällsten G, Andersson L, Almstrand A-C, Gustafson P, Andersson M et al. (2008). Experimental exposure to wood smoke: effects on airway inflammation and oxidative stress. Occup Environ Med. 65:319–324.

● Barregard L, Sällsten G, Gustafson P, Andersson L, Johansson L, Basu S et al. (2006). Experimental exposure to wood-smoke particles in healthy humans: effects on markers of inflammation, coagulation, and lipid peroxidation. Inhal Toxicol. 18:845–853. Bartecchi C, Alsever RN, Nevin-Woods C, Thomas WM, Estacio RO, Bartelson BB et al. (2006). Reduction in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction associated with a citywide smoking ordinance. Circulation 114:1490–1496.

● Bennett DH, McKone TE, Evans JS, Nazaroff WW, Margni MD, Jolliet O et al. (2002). Peer reviewed: defining intake fraction. Environ Sci Technol. 36(9):206A–211A. Bhalla K, Shotten M, Cohen A, Brauer M, Shahraz S, Burnett R et al. (2014). Transport for health: the global burden of disease from motorized road transport. Washington, DC: World Bank (http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/01/19308007/ transport-health-global-burden-disease-motorized-road-transport, accessed 30 September 2014).

● Bond TC, Doherty SJ, Fahey DW, Forster PM, Berntsen T, DeAngelo BJ et al. (2013). Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. J Geophys Res Atmos. 118(11):5380–5552.

● Bonjour S, Adair-Rohani H, Wolf J, Bruce NG, Mehta S et al. (2013). Solid fuel use for household cooking: country and regional estimates for 1980–2010. Environ Health Perspect. 121:784–790.

● Boström C-E, Levander T, Persson B (1982). Luftfororeningar i Sverige 1970-1980 [Air pollution in Sweden 1970–1980]. Solna: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.

● Braniš M, Domasová M (2003). PM10 and black smoke in a small settlement: case study from the Czech Republic. Atmos Environ. 37(1):83–92.

● Brimblecombe P (2012). The big smoke: a history of air pollution in London since medieval times. New York: Routledge.

● Brites (2014). Domestic grants and assistance. Enniskillen: Brites (http:// www.brites.eu/grants-assistance/, accessed 1 October 2014).

● Caamano-Isorna F, Figueiras A, Sastre I, Montes-Martinez A, Taracido M, PiñeiroLamas M (2011). Respiratory and mental health effects of wildfires: an ecological study in Galician municipalities (north-west Spain). Environ Health. 10:48.

● Caseiro A, Bauer H, Schmidl C, Pio CA, Puxbaum H (2009). Wood burning impact on PM10 in three Austrian regions. Atmosc Environ. 43(13):2186–2195.

● Chafe ZA, Brauer M, Klimont Z, Dingenen RV, Mehta S et al. (2014). Household cooking with solid fuels contributes to ambient PM2.5 air pollution and the burden of disease. Environ Health Perspect. DOI:10.1289/ehp.120634.

● Chafe ZA, Brauer M, Klimont Z, Dingenen RV, Mehta S et al. (in press). Ambient air quality (PM2.5) and human health effects of household combustion of solid fuels (wood, coal) for space heating.

● City of Albuquerque (2014). Burn restrictions. Albuquerque: City of Albuquerque (http://www.cabq.gov/airquality/todays-status/burn-no-burn/burnrestrictions#details-of-burn-regulations, accessed 21 October 2014).

● Clancy L, Goodman P, Sinclair H, Dockery DW (2002). Effect of air-pollution control on death rates in Dublin, Ireland: an intervention study. Lancet. 360:1210–1214.

● CSA Group (2010). B415.1-10 – performance testing of solid-fuel-burning heating appliances. Toronto: CSA Group (http://shop.csa.ca/en/canada/fuel-burningequipment/b4151-10/invt/27013322010, accessed 21 October 2014).

● Cupitt, L. T., Glen, W. G., and Lewtas, J. 1994. Exposure and risk from ambient particle-bound pollution in an airshed dominated by residential wood combustion and mobile sources. Environ. Health Perspect. 102(S4):75–84.

● Dennekamp M, Abramson MJ (2011). The effects of bushfire smoke on respiratory health. Respirology 16:198–209.

● Dockery D, Rich DQ, Goodman PG, Clancy L, Ohman-Strickland P, George P et al. (2013). Effect of coal bans on air quality and health in Ireland. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute (Research Report 176; http://pubs.healtheffects.org/view.php?id=409, accessed 1 October 2014).

● Duclos P, Sanderson LM (1990). The 1987 forest fire disaster in California: assessment of emergency room visits. Arch Environ Health. 45:53–58.

● Dzioubinski O, Chipman R (1999). Trends in consumption and production: household energy consumption. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA Discussion Paper No. 6; http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.ph p?page=view&type=400&nr=77&menu=35, accessed 25 September 2014).

● ECF (2010). Biomass for heat and power: opportunity and economics. The Hague: European Climate Foundation (http://www.europeanclimate.org/documents/Biomass_ report_-_Final.pdf, accessed 22 September 2014).

● EC JRC (2014). ACU – Air and Climate Unit. Brussels: European Commission Joint Research Centre (http://ccaqu.jrc.ec.europa.eu/home.php, accessed 21 October 2014).

● Environment Canada (2006). Model municipal by-law for regulating wood heating appliances. Ottawa: Environment Canada (http://publications.gc.ca/ pub?id=286239&sl=0, accessed 21 October 2014).

● EPA (2014). Agencies – ordinances and regulations. Research Triangle Park, NC: United States Environmental Protection Agency (http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/ ordinances.html, accessed 1 October 2014).

● Epstein PR, Buonocore JJ, Eckerle K, Hendryx M, Stout III BM, Heinberg R et al. (2011). Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1219:73–98. Eriksson AC, Nordin EZ, Nyström R, Pettersson E, Swietlicki E, Bergvall C et al.

● (2014). Particulate PAH emissions from residential biomass combustion: time-resolved analysis with aerosol mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol. 48(12):7143–7150.

● European Commission (2009). Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products. O. J. E. U., L 285 (http://ec.europa.eu/ enterprise/policies/european-standards/harmonised-standards/ecodesign/index_ en.htm, accessed 21 October 2014).

● FAO (2010). What woodfuels can do to mitigate climate change. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO Forestry Paper 162; http://www. fao.org/docrep/013/i1756e/i1756e00.htm, accessed 1 October 2014).

● Frederiksen S, Werner S (2013). District heating and cooling. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Gan WQ, FitzGerald JM, Carlsten C, Sadatsafavi M, Brauer M (2013). Associations of ambient air pollution with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalization and mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 187:721–727.

● Gehring U, Tamburic L, Sbihi H, Davies H, Brauer M (2014). Impact of noise and air pollution on pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiology. 25:351–358.

● Ghio AJ, Soukup JM, Case M, Dailey LA, Richards J, Berntsen J et al. (2011). Exposure to wood smoke particles produces inflammation in healthy volunteers. Occup Environ Med. 69(3):170–5.

● Gianelle V, Colombi C, Caserini S, Ozgen S, Galante S, Marongiu A et al. (2013). Benzo(a)pyrene air concentrations and emission inventory in Lombardy region, Italy. Atmos Pollut Res. 4:257–266.

● Golshan M, Faghihi M, Roushan-Zamir T, Marandi MM, Esteki B, Dadvand P et al. (2002). Early effects of burning rice farm residues on respiratory symptoms of villagers in suburbs of Isfahan, Iran. Int J Environ Health Res. 12(2):125–131.

● Goodman P, Agnew M, McCaffrey M, Paul G, Clancy L (2007). Effects of the Irish smoking ban on respiratory health of bar workers and air quality in Dublin pubs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 175:840–845.

● Hanigan I, Johnston F, Morgan G (2008). Vegetation fire smoke, indigenous status and cardio-respiratory hospital admissions in Darwin, Australia, 1996–2005: a time-series study. Environ Health. 7:42.

● Hine DW, Bhullar N, Marks ADG, Kelly P, Scott JG (2011). Comparing the effectiveness of education and technology in reducing wood smoke pollution:a field experiment. J Environ Psychol. 31:282–288.

● Hine DW, Marks ADG, Nachreiner M, Gifford R, Heath Y (2007). Keeping the home fires burning: the affect heuristic and wood smoke pollution. J Environ Psychol. 27:26–32. Hoek G, Kos G, Harrison R, de Hartog J, Meliefste K, ten Brink H et al. (2008). Indoor– outdoor relationships of particle number and mass in four European cities. Atmos Environ. 42(1):156–169.

● Holstius D, Reid C, Jesdale B, Morello-Frosch R (2012). Birth weight following pregnancy during the 2003 Southern California wildfires. Environ Health Perspect. 120:1340–1345.

● Houck JE, Eagle BN (2006). Control analysis and documentation for residential wood combustion in the MANE-VU Region. Baltimore, MD: Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association.

● IARC (2010). Household use of solid fuels and high-temperature frying. Lyon: IARC (IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol. 95; http:// monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol95/, accessed 21 October 2014).

● IEA (2013). Nordic energy technology perspectives: pathways to a carbon neutral energy future. Paris: International Energy Agency (http://energioresund.org/pic_m/23_ verdi_182_Nordic-Energy-Technology-Perspectives.pdf, accessed 22 September 2014).

● IIASA (2014). Greenhouse gas – air pollution interactions and synergies (GAINS) model. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (http://gains. iiasa.ac.at/models/, accessed 21 October 2014).

● Jacobs J, Kreutzer R (1997). Rice burning and asthma hospitalizations, Butte County, California, 1983–1992. Environ Health Perspect. 105:980–985.

● Jacobson LdSV, Hacon SdS, Castro HAd, Ignotti E, Artaxo P, Ponce de Leon ACM (2012). Association between fine particulate matter and the peak expiratory flow of schoolchildren in the Brazilian subequatorial Amazon: a panel study. Environ Res. 117:27–35.

● Janssen NA, Gerlofs-Nijland ME, Lanki T, Salonen RO, Cassee F, Hoek G et al. (2012). Health effects of black carbon. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe;

● (http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/air-quality/ publications/2012/health-effects-of-black-carbon, accessed 26 September 2014).

● Jeong C-H, Evans GJ, Dann T, Graham M, Herod D, Dabek-Zlotorzynska E et al. (2008). Influence of biomass burning on wintertime fine particulate matter: source contribution at a valley site in rural British Columbia. Atmos Environ. 42:3684–3699.

● Johnston F, Bailie R, Pilotto L, Hanigan I (2007). Ambient biomass smoke and cardiorespiratory hospital admissions in Darwin, Australia. BMC Public Health. 7:240.

● Johnston F, Hanigan I, Henderson S, Morgan G (2013). Evaluation of interventions to reduce air pollution from biomass smoke on mortality in Launceston, Australia: retrospective analysis of daily mortality, 1994–2007. BMJ. 346:e8446–e8446.

● Johnston F, Henderson S, Chen Y, Randerson JT, Marlier M, Defries RS et al. (2012). Estimated global mortality attributable to smoke from landscape fires. Environ Health Perspect. 120:695–701.

● Karr CJ, Demers PA, Koehoorn MW, Lencar CC, Tamburic L, Brauer M (2009). Influence of ambient air pollutant sources on clinical encounters for infant bronchiolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 180:995–1001.

● Kim E, Hopke PK (2008). Source characterization of ambient fine particles at multiple sites in the Seattle area. Atmos Environ. 42(24):6047–6056.

● Kjällstrand J, Olsson M (2004). Chimney emissions from small-scale burning of pellets and fuelwood – examples referring to different combustion appliances. Biomass Bioenergy. 27(6):557–561.

● Kocbach Bølling A, Pagels J, Yttri K, Barregard L, Sallsten G, Schwarze PE et al. (2009). Health effects of residential wood smoke particles: the importance of combustion conditions and physicochemical particle properties. Part Fibre Toxicol. 6:29.

● Kunii O, Kanagawa S, Yajima I, Hisamatsu Y, Yamamura S, Amagai T et al. (2002). The 1997 haze disaster in Indonesia: its air quality and health effects. Arch Environ Health. 57:16–22.

● Kupiainen K, Klimont Z (2007). Primary emissions of fine carbonaceous particles in Europe. Atmos Environ 41(10): 2156-2170.

● Larson T, Gould T, Simpson C, Liu LJS, Claiborn C, Lewtas J (2004). Source apportionment of indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 in Seattle, Washington, using positive matrix factorization. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 54(9):1175–1187.

● Larson T, Koenig JQ (1994). Wood smoke: emissions and noncancer respiratory effects. Annu Rev Public Health. 15:133–156.

● Levander T, Bodin S (2014). Controlling emissions from wood burning: legislation and regulations in Nordic countries to control emissions from residential wood burning – an examination of past experience. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.

● Lighty JS, Veranth JM, Sarofim AF (2000). Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size and composition and implications to human health. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 50(9):1565–1618.

● Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H et al. (2012). A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 380:2224–2260.

● Long WQ, Tate RB, Neuman M, Manfreda J, Becker AB, Anthonisen NR (1998). Respiratory symptoms in a susceptible population due to burning of agricultural residue. Chest. 113:351–357.

● Loomis D, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, Ghissassi FE, Bouvard V Benbrahim-Tallaa L et al. (2013). The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution. Lancet Oncol. 14(13):1262–1263.

● MacIntyre EA, Karr CJ, Koehoorn M, Demers PA, Tamburic L, Lencar C et al. (2011). Residential air pollution and otitis media during the first two years of life. Epidemiology. 22:81–89.

● Mazzoleni LR, Zielinska B, Moosmuller H (2007). Emissions of levoglucosan, methoxy phenols, and organic acids from prescribed burns, laboratory combustion of wildland fuels, and residential wood combustion. Environ Sci Technol. 41(7):2115–2122.

● McCracken JP, Wellenius GA, Bloomfield GS, Brook RD, Tolunay HE, Dockery DW et al. (2012). Household air pollution from solid fuel use: evidence for links to CVD. Glob Heart. 7(3):223–234.

● Mirabelli MC, Kunzli N, Avol E, Gilliland FD, Gauderman WJ, McConnell R et al. (2009). Respiratory symptoms following wildfire smoke exposure: airway size as a susceptibility factor. Epidemiology. 20:451–459.

● Mott JA, Mannino DM, Alverson CJ, Kiyu A, Hashim J, Lee T et al. (2005). Cardiorespiratory hospitalizations associated with smoke exposure during the 1997 Southeast Asian forest fires. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 208:75–85.

● Naeher LP, Brauer M, Lipsett M, Zelikoff JT, Simpson CD, Koenig JQ et al. (2007). Woodsmoke health effects: a review. Inhal Toxicol. 19(1):67–106.

● Noonan C, Navidi W, Sheppard L, Palmer CP, Bergauff M, Hooper K et al. (2012). Residential indoor PM2.5 in wood stove homes: follow-up of the Libby changeout program. Indoor Air. 22:492–500.

● Ofgem (2014). About the Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive. London: Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/environmentalprogrammes/domestic-renewable-heat-incentive/about-domestic-renewable-heatincentive, accessed 22 September 2014).

● Olsson M, Kjällstrand J (2006). Low emissions from wood burning in an ecolabelled residential boiler. Atmos Environ. 40:1148–1158.

● Ovadnevaité J, Kvietkus K, Maršalka A (2006). 2002 summer fires in Lithuania: impact on the Vilnius city air quality and the inhabitants health. Sci Total Environ. 356:11–21.

● Pearson P, Bodin S, Nordberg L, Pettus A (2013). On thin ice: how cutting pollution can slow warming and save lives, vol. 1. Washington DC: World Bank (http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/10/18496924/thin-ice-cutting-pollution-can-slowwarming-save-lives-vol-1-2-main-report, accessed 22 September 2014).

● Piazzalunga A, Belis C, Bernardoni V, Cazzuli O, Fermo P, Valli G et al. (2011). Estimates of wood burning contribution to PM by the macro-tracer method using tailored emission factors. Atmos Environ. 45(37):6642–6649.

● Riahi K, Dentener F, Gielen D, Grubler A, Jewell J, Klimont Z et al. (2012). Energy pathways for sustainable development. In: Global Energy Assessment: toward a sustainable future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: pp. 1203–1306 (http:// catalog.ipbes.net/assessments/101, accessed 30 September 2014).

● Riddervold IS, Bønløkke JH, Mølhave L, Massling A, Jensen B, Grønborg TK et al. (2011). Wood smoke in a controlled exposure experiment with human volunteers. Inhal Toxicol. 23(5):277–288.

● Ries FJ, Marshall JD, Brauer M (2009). Intake fraction of urban wood smoke. Environ Sci Technol. 43(13):4701–4706.

● Saarnio K, Niemi JV, Saarikoski S, Aurela M, Timonen H, Teinilä K et al. (2012). Using monosaccharide anhydrides to estimate the impact of wood combustion on fine particles in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Boreal Environ Res. 17(3–4):163–183.

● Saffari A, Daher N, Samara C, Voutsa D, Kouras A et al. (2013). Increased biomass burning due to the economic crisis in Greece and its adverse impact on wintertime air quality in Thessaloniki. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47:13313–13320.

● Schipper L, Ketoff A, Kahane A (1985). Explaining residential energy use by international bottom-up comparisons. Annu Rev Energy. 10:341–405.

● SEAI (2014). Greener homes scheme statistics. Dublin: Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (http://www.seai.ie/Grants/GreenerHomes/Scheme_Statistics/, accessed 1 October 2014).

● Sehlstedt M, Dove R, Boman C, Pagels J, Swietlicki E, Löndahl J et al. (2010). Antioxidant airway responses following experimental exposure to wood smoke in man. Part Fibre Toxicol. 7:21.

● Smith K, Bruce N, Balakrishnan K, Adair-Rohani H, Balmes J, Chafe Z et al. (2014). Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health. 35:185–206.

● Smith K, Jerrett M, Anderson HR, Burnett RT, Stone V, Derwent R et al. (2009). Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants. Lancet. 374:2091–2103.

● Smith K, McCracken JP, Weber M, Hubbard A, Jenny A, Thompson LM et al. (2011). Effect of reduction in household air pollution on childhood pneumonia in Guatemala (RESPIRE): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 378:1717–1726.

● Solomon C (2003). The effect of smoke from burning vegetative residues on airway inflammation and pulmonary function in healthy, asthmatic, and allergic individuals. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency (http://www.arb.ca.gov/ research/single-project.php?row_id=59924, accessed 30 September 2014).

● Statistics Finland (2014). Energy 2013 [online database]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland (http://pxweb2.stat.fi/sahkoiset_julkaisut/energia2013/html/engl0000.htm, accessed 6 November 2014).

● Taimisto P, Tainio M, Karvosenoja N, Kupiainen K, Porvari P, Karppinen A et al. (2011). Evaluation of intake fractions for different subpopulations due to primary fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emitted from domestic wood combustion and traffic in Finland. Air Qual Atmos Health. 4:199–209.

● UNECE (2012). Decision 2012/2: amendment of the text of and annexes II to IX to the 1999 Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone and the addition of new annexes X and XI. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/multi_h1.html, accessed 1 October 2014).

● UNEP, WMO (2011). Integrated assessment of black carbon and tropospheric ozone. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Program and World Meteorological Organization (http://climate-l.iisd.org/news/unep-wmo-release-black-carbon-and-troposphericozone-assessment/, accessed 1 October 2014).

● United States Census Bureau (2011). Historical census of housing tables: house heating fuel. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau (https://www. census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/fuels.html, accessed 25 September 2014).

● Unosson J, Blomberg A, Sandstrom T, Muala A, Boman C, Nyström R et al. (2013). Exposure to wood smoke increases arterial stiffness and decreases heart rate variability in humans. Part Fibre Toxicol. 10:20.

● Ward T, Boulafentis J, Simpson J, Hester C, Moliga T, Warden K et al. (2011). Lessons learned from a woodstove changeout on the Nez Perce Reservation. Sci Total Environ. 409:664–670.

● Ward T, Lange T (2010). The impact of wood smoke on ambient PM2.5 in northern Rocky Mountain valley communities. Environ Pollut. 158:723–729.

● Ward T, Palmer C, Bergauff M, Hooper K, Noonan C (2008). Results of a residential indoor PM2.5 sampling program before and after a woodstove changeout. Indoor Air. 18:408–415.

● Ward T, Palmer C, Bergauff M, Jayanty RKM, Noonan C (2011). Organic/elemental carbon and woodsmoke tracer concentrations following a community wide woodstove changeout program. Atmos Environ. 45:5554–5560.

● Ward T, Palmer C, Noonan C (2010). Fine particulate matter source apportionment following a large woodstove changeout program in Libby, Montana. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 60:688–693.

● WHO (2014a). Indoor air quality guidelines for household fuel combustion. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/indoorair/guidelines/hhfc, accessed 12 November 2014).

● WHO (2014b). Frequently asked questions: ambient and household air pollution and health – update 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/phe/ health_topics/outdoorair/databases/en/, accessed 26 September 2014).

● WHO Regional Office for Europe (2006). WHO air quality guidelines: global update 2005 – particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environmentand-health/air-quality/publications/pre2009/air-quality-guidelines.-global-update- 2005.-particulate-matter,-ozone,-nitrogen-dioxide-and-sulfur-dioxide, accessed 21 October 2014).

● WHO Regional Office for Europe (2013). Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAAP project: technical report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/air-quality/ publications/2013/review-of-evidence-on-health-aspects-of-air-pollution-revihaapproject-final-technical-report), accessed 26 November 2014.